Minolta pocket Autopak 470

Pocket Dynamite or Dud ? -Minolta pocket Autopak 470 Review

So I must admit i’m a bit of a fan of Minolta’s 110 cameras. If you’ve followed this blog you’ll know I highly rate some of the models in the Pocket Autopak 400 series pretty highly for this class.

So when I got my hands on the top dog of the class I was pretty excited. But it didn’t quite live up to the hype.

Area 51
Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 using Lomography Color Tiger 200CN. 2019

Minolta were in a good place for the 110 format. they’d been making 16mm compact cameras for years before the folk at Rochester NY dreamed up 110 in 1972. So it was an easy transition for the company.

Minolta didn’t go for the entry level market and when for the mid and high end users with focus-able compacts and their mythic Zoom SLRs. I’ll leave you to debate such logic for the format which suffered from variable often crap lab processing and print making.

Devorgilla I
Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 using Lomography Color Tiger 200CN. 2019

400 Not out

Of their mid range compacts the Pocket Autopak 400 series is probably to most accessible using batteries that are still easily available. The models are outlined in my post on the 430EX, the entry level camera of the series.

Top Dog

The 470 is the top dog on paper of the series. It features a 26mm 1:3.5 Rokkor 4 element lens purportedly in Tessar construction. An addition close up lens adds to the existing 5 focus zones. CdS metering is tied to an electronically controlled shutter with speeds from 2-1/1000.

Hydrant
Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 using Lomography Color Tiger 200CN. 2019 . Brown yellow tones seems to be an issue with the this film not the camera IMHO

Unlike the other models in the series, this has a detachable flash unit. It also has standard cable tripod points. Power is by 2xSR44 for the camera and the flash takes an AA. The camera has notch sensing to separate lower speed 80-100 ISO from 400 ISO. However given the only in production 110 films are 200 ISO this is a moot point.

There is no deluxe “X” version to my knowledge unlike the other cameras in the series

Detached looks

This is a well finished machine. The camera only seems to come in silver and black as shown here but is incredibly well thought out. The detachable flash uses as standard hot shoe so in theory you could use any old flash unit although metering is eared for the built in one.

The camera’s unintended potential weakpoint sits in front of the flash mount. As with many cameras from the 1970’s, left leaky batteries are a potential issue. So make sure the battery compartment for the 2xSR44 type batteries is clean. A battery check button sits on the other side with a red LED in viewfinder (this also comes on in too low light)

Top of Minolta Pocket Autopak 470
Top of Minolta Pocket Autopak 470

The a slider protects the lens and turns off the metering. It also serves to move the extra close up lens out of the way if you forget. That lens allows you to focus at 0.5m (1.6ft) although I can’t say that adds much to a camera that without can go to 0.9m (3ft). There’s an easily missed warning arrow in viewfinder

That viewfinder features the 5 distance pictograms which match for 0.9, 1.2, 2, 3.5 & 10m+ (3,4, 7, 11 & 33+ ft in old money). You set these on the scale focus slider on the top plate. If you can’t remember, they printed a table on the base.

Baseplate of Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 with focus table.
Baseplate of Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 with focus table.

The flash likewise has a range chart printed on it. Worth noting the camera syncs at 1/100 and you’ll need a AA battery to power. iT has a manual switch on rear and a locking tab that needs to released when taking off.

Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 with flash and table on rear of flash.
Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 with flash and table on rear of flash.

Results

I’m slightly disappointed here.

The exposure system on the whole is okay but struggles with backlit scenes as many area metering cameras do. But unlike many 1970’s 35mm compacts, you can’t adjust the ISO to compensate.

Devorgilla II
Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 using Lomography Color Tiger 200CN. 2019 .

It’s better than the 430EX and 460T but not by much.

The same could be same of the optics. Once again the 26mm lens in this format is not that wide (about equivalent to a 52mm in 135 format). There’s a smidge of barrel distortion but not bad and yes this is the best of the 3 for long shots. But Shorter/medium distance shots can be a tad inconsistent when the light fades

Radial distortion test
This was meant as the distortion test shot but illustrates the issue with focus and low DoF. Car is crisp 1-2m in front of quite soft door. Minolta Pocket Autopak 470 using Lomography Color Tiger 200CN. 2019

The problem is the camera seems to widen aperture to preserve shutter speed. So if you shoot lomography film is the camera asssumes it’s 80 ISO, so in anything below brilliant sunlight the aperture is going wide to keep the speed above 1/100. This gives rise to many shots having quite shallow depth of field. meaning some objects can be really sharp but within a metre or 2 things soften rapidly.

This negates the optical advantage over it’s lesser brethern.

Conclusions

This is a wonderfully engineered 110 camera and is the smallest in its series thanks to the detachable flash. It on paper is optically better and features proper exposure. And yes it is better than the lesser models in the same series esp on the long shots.

But with slower film the poor DoF makes this a hard camera to guess focus especially at nearer distances loosing the advantage. Nor can you compensate for backlight.

I just doesn’t keep up with Voigtländer Vitoret 110 or Rollei A110. These are even smaller and in the case of the Vitoret much simpler.

It’s a good 110 but not a great one


Sources & other info

Jim Grey’s great review of this camera pretty much acts as the manual online and is worth checking out. Jim wasn’t a fan either. For a more positive take check out the one ten guy’s 2 part review. Pacific Rim Camera has copies of Minolta Dealer guides (part 8 of the 1981 one covers 110 cameras)

4 thoughts on “Pocket Dynamite or Dud ? -Minolta pocket Autopak 470 Review”

  1. Great – A contemporary review of the 110 format! I have the Autopak 460Tx – have had ok, appropriately lo-fi results from this, bordering on interesting when used with flash and subject is no more than 5ft away.

    But for results with more keepers from a 110 try the Agfa Optima 6000 (w the pocket Lux flash). Better resolved detail, better colours, sharper all round, compose it right and it even throws in a little of that coveted 3D effect, a flippin’ miracle for 110.

    Oh and never, ever, use the lomo lobster red 110 film. Just….never.

  2. Great post and thanks for the link! I did notice an issue with backlit scenes as well but since I was inside and shooting two people who were in front of a window, I blamed my composition choice more than the camera. It also didn’t do great at a distance in dim light. But I still think overall it is a WAY better choice than anything Kodak offered and for only a few bucks more in today’s market, hard to beat.

  3. I enjoy your reviews, but I find the subjects you don’t always give the cameras credit: why not shoot some human models, to see what the DoF on portraits can be like? Or try scenes with more detail to evaluate sharpness? Thanks anyways, love the blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.